Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki.

Steindl, Josef

Bibliografische Daten

Werk

Dokumentenart:: Werk

Sammlung:: Nachlass Josef Steindl

Titel:: Distribution Theory in Marx and in Kalecki.

Autor/in:: Steindl, Josef

Art/Umfang:: Typoskript, 3 Blätter, 4 beschriebene Seiten, mit zahlreichen eigenhändigen Korrekturen und Ergänzungen

Erscheinungsjahr:: ohne Datum

Beschreibung:: Verteilungstheorie bei Kalecki und Unterschiede zur marxschen Verteilungstheorie, vor allem in Bezug auf Surplus (Mehrprodukt) und Monopol.

Anmerkung:: Unveröffentlichtes Typoskript.

Thema:: Wirtschaftsgeschichte, Wirtschaftstheorie, aktuelle Entwicklungen

JEL Klassifikation:: E11 [General Aggregative Models: Marxian, Sraffian, Kaleckian]

Signatur:: S/M.11.1

Nutzungsrechte:: Rechte vorbehalten

Zugriff:: Freier Zugriff

{ He might have found himself unwillingly embraced and joined by people who would say: Of course, wejhave always said monopoly is all the trouble. We have td fight it, to abolish it, that is all there is to it. But those, of course^would be wrong, becasjiie they overlook or ignore that monopoly is not a remnant o^feudal institutions which can be abolished like ananachronistic institution bound to decay, but it is an essential feature of t^e capitalism itself. This is because freedom of entry can never be realised when the number of pq^ple with sufficient wealth to exp$it the t^e technical and economic opportunities for gain are limited in relation to those opportunities. This is what Joan Robinson called the property qualification of entry into business. In fact the situation in industry is similar to that obtaining- in the case of rent arising from the difference in quality of land: There are different degrees of ./ advantage or opportunity ; and the best places are occupied by the largest wealth while the most modest resources have to be content to exist on a level of renumeration which .offers at best reproduction of the resources. '.Kalecki did not formulate it in this way but his formal // ^ theory which makes the surplus depend on the dgree of monopoly, can be easily reconciled with EEe aSEw si-vi O-u-, , Marx, on the other hand, in his endeavour to meet his opponent -that is the classical economist - on his own ground, namely free competition, was bound to look for the source of exploitation in the labour market.

Werk

Download und Zitieren

Werk

Bild

Bildfragment

Zitierlinks

Zitierempfehlung